Monthly Archives: December 2016

2016 Ends With A Whimper: Stocks Slide On Last Minute Pension Fund Selling

Nobody has any idea what will happen, or frankly, what is happening when dealing with artificial, centrally-planned markets …

https://s16-us2.ixquick.com/cgi-bin/serveimage?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.zerohedge.com%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%2Fimages%2Fuser3303%2Fimageroot%2F20151115_stifel1.jpg&sp=86571a472b6a5e0f77ae4916824527e6

When we first warned 8 days ago that in the last week of trading a “Red Flag For Markets Has Emerged: Pension Funds To Sell “Near Record Amount Of Stocks In The Next Few Days”, and may have to “rebalance”, i.e. sell as much as $58 billion of equity to debt ahead of year end, many scoffed wondering who would be stupid enough to leave such a material capital reallocation for the last possible moment in a market that is already dangerously thin as is, and in which such a size order would be sure to move markets lower, and not just one day.

Today we got the answer, and yes – pension funds indeed left the reallocation until the last possible moment, because three days after the biggest drop in the S&P in over two months, the equity selling persisted as the reallocation trade continued, leading to the S&P closing off the year with a whimper, not a bang, as Treasurys rose, reaching session highs minutes before the 1pm ET futures close when month-end index rebalancing took effect.

10Y yields were lower by 2bp-3bp after the 2pm cash market close, with the 10Y below closing levels since Dec. 8. Confirming it was indeed a substantial rebalancing trade, volumes surged into the futures close, which included a 5Y block trade with ~$435k/DV01 according to Bloomberg while ~80k 10Y contracts traded over a 3- minute period.

https://i0.wp.com/www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/images/user5/imageroot/2016/12/30/20161230_EOY6%20-%2010Y%20Intraday_0.JPG

The long-end led the late rally, briefly flattening 5s30s back to little changed at 112.5bps. Month-end flows started to pick up around noon amid reports of domestic real money demand; +0.07yr duration extension was estimated for Bloomberg Barclays Treasury Index. Earlier, TSYs were underpinned by declines for U.S. equities that accelerated after Dec. Chicago PMI fell more than expected.

Looking further back, the Treasury picture is one of “sell in December 2015 and go away” because as shown in the chart below, the 10Y closed 2016 just shy of where it was one year ago while the 30Y is a “whopping” 4 bps wider on the year, and considering the recent drop in yields as doubts about Trumpflation start to swirl, we would not be surprised to see a sharp drop in yields in the first weeks of 2017. Already in Europe, German Bunds are back to where they were on the day Trump was elected.

https://i0.wp.com/www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/images/user5/imageroot/2016/12/30/20161230_EOY6%20-%2010Y%202016_0.jpg

So with a last minute scramble for safety in Treasures, it was only logical that stocks would slide, closing the year off on a weak note. Sure enough, the S&P500 pared its fourth annual gain in the last five years, as it slipped to a three-week low in light holiday trading, catalyzed by the above mentioned pension fund selling.

https://i0.wp.com/www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/images/user5/imageroot/2016/12/30/20161230_EOY8%20-%20SPX_0.jpg

The day started off, appropriately enough, with a Dollar flash crash, which capped any potential gains in the USD early on, and while a spike in the euro trimmed the dollar’s fourth straight yearly advance, the greenback still closed just shy of 13 year highs, up just shy of 3% for the year. 

Meanwhile, the year’s best surprising performing asset, crude, trimmed its gain in 2016 to 52%.

https://i0.wp.com/www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/images/user5/imageroot/2016/12/30/20161230_EOY7%20-%20WTI%20YTD_0.jpg

The S&P 500 Index cut its advance this year to 9.7 percent as it headed for the first three-days slide since the election. The Dow Jones Industrial Average was poised to finish the year 200 points below 20,000 after climbing within 30 points earlier in the week. It appears the relentless cheer leading by CNBC’s Bob Pisani finally jinxed the Dow’s chances at surpassing 20,000 in 2016. Trading volume was at least 34 percent below the 30-day average at this time of day. A rapid surge in the euro disturbed the calm during the Asian morning, as a rush of computer-generated orders caught traders off guard. That sent a measure of the dollar lower for a second day, trimming its rally this year below 3 percent.

Actually, did we say crude was the best performing asset of the year? We meant Bitcoin, the same digital currency which we said in September 2015 (when it was trading at $250) is set to soar as Chinese residents start using it more actively to circumvent capital controls, soared, and in 2016 exploded higher by over 120%.

https://i0.wp.com/www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/images/user5/imageroot/2016/12/30/bitcoin%20ytd%202_0.jpg

For those nostalgic about 2016, the chart below breaks down the performance of major US indices in 2016 – what began as the worst start to a year on record, ended up as a solid year performance wise, with the S&P closing up just shy of 10%, with more than half of the gains coming courtesy of an event which everyone was convinced would lead to a market crash and/or recession, namely Trump’s election, showing once again that when dealing with artificial, centrally-planned market nobody has any idea what will happen, or frankly, what is happening.

https://i0.wp.com/www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/images/user5/imageroot/2016/12/30/20161230_EOY1_0.jpg

Looking at the breakdown between the main asset classes, while 30Y TSYs are closing the year effectively unchanged, the biggest equity winners were financials which after hugging the flat line, soared after the Trump election on hopes of deregulation, reduced taxes and a Trump cabinet comprised of former Wall Streeters, all of which would boost financial stocks, such as Goldman Sachs, which single handedly contributed nearly a quarter of the Dow Jones “Industrial” Average’s upside since the election.

https://i0.wp.com/www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/images/user5/imageroot/2016/12/30/20161230_EOY2_0.jpg

The FX world was anything but boring this year: while the dollar soared on expectations of reflation and recovery, the biggest moves relative to the USD belonged to sterling, with cable plunging after Brexit and never really recovering, while the Yen unexpectedly soared for most of the year, only to cut most of its gains late in the year, when the Trump election proved to be more powerful for Yen devaluation that the BOJ’s QE and NIRP.

https://i0.wp.com/www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/images/user5/imageroot/2016/12/30/20161230_EOY3_0.jpg

The largely unspoken story of the year is that while stocks, if only in the US – both Europe and Japan closed down on the year – jumped on the back of the Trump rally, bonds tumbled. The problem is that with many investors and retirees’ funds have been tucked away firmly in the rate-sensitive space, read bonds, so it is debatable if equity gains offset losses suffered by global bondholders.

https://i0.wp.com/www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/images/user5/imageroot/2016/12/30/20161230_EOY4_0.jpg

And speaking of the divergence between US equities and, well, everything else, no other chart shows the Trump “hope” trade of 2016 better than this one: spot thee odd “market” out.

https://i0.wp.com/www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/images/user5/imageroot/2016/12/30/20161230_EOY5_0.jpg

So as we close out 2016 and head into 2017, all we can add is that the Trump “hope” better convert into something tangible fast, or there will be a lot of very disappointed equity investors next year.

And with that brief walk down the 2016 memory lane, we wish all readers fewer centrally-planned, artificial “markets” and more true price discovery and, of course, profits.  See you all on the other side.

By Tyler Durden | ZeroHedge

Top Questions about Mobile Home Investing

1. What is a mobile home good for?

Why would we buy these things? Do people actually want to live in a mobile home? They’re undesirable right? Aren’t mobile homes often in bad neighborhoods? I wouldn’t want to live there myself so why would I want to buy one? Well here’s the answer. Mobile homes are good for cash flow. I know everybody that gets started in real estate investing often try to do flipping because they want these big paychecks but the big paychecks, they come and they go. Reality television makes lots of money off showcasing how easy and fun rehabbing a home can be. However, cash flow doesn’t go anywhere, it stays there for a long time and it’s the way you obtain your financial freedom. So the more cash flow, the more mobile home investments you have, the more assets you acquire means the more post office paychecks you’re going to have coming in. Imagine having to go to your post office every month for your paycheck. So, that’s why mobile homes can be a good investment and not just something to disregard in your investment portfolio, you invest in mobile homes for the cash flow alone.

2. Do I need money to get started?

No. You do not need money to get started in mobile home investing. This is the biggest myth ever and some of the worst talk you can hear from some of your peers or your family is that you need to have money to make money. That’s a self-defeating prophecy.
This is False!!!!!
If you do not have time to invest in learning how to make cash off real estate investing then you will need money…. But, if you are sitting on a large savings account then you just need to put more time and effort on your part to make investing profitable for you. Put forth a little bit of effort to go out and find some deals, wholesale some deals, help out sellers, find some motivated sellers who need help and pocket thousands of dollars. Take that money and put it into your assets and keep doing the same thing over, over and over again until you have enough to acquire your financial freedom. Easy enough, right??? If you are laughing just keep reading and learning.

3. Do I need a dealer’s license to be a mobile home investor?

No. No you do not. Now if you ask a dealer this they’ll say yes. Yes you do, why do they say this? Just like if you ask a realtor if wholesaling properties is okay, they might say its illegal, because without a realtor they make no money. You do not need a dealer’s license to be a mobile home investor. Now if you’re selling, or flipping a certain amount of mobile homes every year you’re going to qualify for needing to get your dealer’s license but if you’re just dealing the properties or using them as rentals you need not have your dealer’s license.

4. Can I rent mobile homes in a mobile home parks?

Yes you can, But this is the number one mistake I see mobile home investors do is that they will pick up the phone and call all the mobile home parks in their area and t say, “Can I rent a mobile home in your park?” You know what they’re going to say? “No because I don’t want the problems of you coming into my park and doing a rental agreement with somebody and then your tenant thinking what’s in your rental agreement is more important than what is in my lot agreement. You understand? That causes problems. So just by picking up the phone and calling around asking everybody if you can rent in their park shows that you do not know what you are doing. Do not do that. Do not make this newbie mistake. Can you rent in parks? Yes. If they tell you that you can rent in their park go ahead. Just don’t ask them. Rule of thumb, don’t ask them. However, be smart enough to read the parks contract on lot rent and mobile home usage within their park.

5. Will a mobile home appreciate in value?

Well the Manufacturing Housing Institute says yes. I say no, not at all. The longer you own a mobile home the less its worth until eventually one day it’s going to be worth very little. That’s going to be the maximum value that you can get for the home in your area. Now other than that can they appreciate? In theory, well if there is mobile home parks in Florida where mobile home junkers go for $10,000 a piece but yet there’s mobile home parks in South Carolina where the mobile homes go for $500 or even free, so obviously there’s a difference in value being the different areas. So now all of a sudden if South Carolina real estate switched to be like Florida real estate well in theory then a mobile home could appreciate but does a mobile home appreciate? Generally, no. However, if you have read the first part of this post then you already realize that appreciation is not what you are striving for with mobile homes.

6. Should I buy a mobile home that needs to be moved?

Generally, no. You don’t want to do that because if you have to buy a mobile home and then it has to be moved, then you are now paying the amount to purchase the mobile home and also paying for the mobile home to be moved. You really do not want to do that. This extra expense could make your numbers go into the red. You will be adding all that extra expense into the purchase price of your mobile home. So what does this mean?? Well, what that means is that it is now going to take twice as long to get all your money back that you have invested into your mobile home. Do you want to wait 2-3 years before you actually make a buck or do you want to make it now? Do you want to do it in 6 months or 12 months, me I prefer 6 months so I try not to move mobile homes.
Now in my system “The Keys to Cash Flow”, I teach you how to get a mobile home moved for free. That’s right, for free. I show you how you can still go out and buy a mobile home that needs to be moved and use a different strategy where somebody else will be paying to move it instead of you. Yes, there are ways that you can buy a mobile home if it has to be moved and still make it into a deal. Just remember that the rule of thumb is that if you’re going to go out and buy a mobile home that has to be moved, it is going to increase the cost of the asset and delay your profits.

7. What kind of financing is available?

Generally, not much and usually none is available. No bank or finance company wants to finance mobile homes. When you get a whole bunch of mobile homes and you go into the bank and you say, “Well I’ve got a bunch of these mobile homes that I’m going to use as collateral towards something else.” No, the banks will not use them as collateral. Really a mobile home, is really only worth how much money it is getting in every single month or how much money it can be wholesaled or flipped for. So that’s the true value of the property, how much money does it get monthly and beyond that the banks really do not care how much it is worth. It is a mobile home. It’s a wobbly box. That’s the way they look at it. Banks will not refinance them and a lot of them have a hard time even giving you financing on them. If you go into a mortgage officer they are not going to be able to do a loan for you. Some try to go to a branch bank and they might do a loan for you or there is actually a smarter route out there called private moneylenders. Now when you start getting involved in being a mobile home investor other investors see what you are doing and they will say, “Wow, there’s some really big numbers there. Why don’t you let me give you the cash to go ahead and fix that deal and put some money in it.” Well that all works out great. You give them a better interest rate than they can get any place else bar none and still have a great deal on your hands. If you can give someone clear up to 15% on a 12-month or even a 3-month then that’s amazing. Now imagine if you had your deal with them where they were making 15% every 3 months imagine if you have that with them for a full 12 months that could be up to a 60% return per year. Who offers that? This makes it a win win situation for private moneylenders and for the average investor to make monthly cash flow off a small investment.

8. Singlewides or doublewides?

Singlewides!! Doublewides are double the expense. You think, “Oh, if it’s a double wide is it going to be double the amount of money I get each month for it?” Nope, not really. Often what’s going to happen is doublewides are going to have a mortgage payment on them. So every month there is nobody paying you rent, you will still have to pay a note to someone. This stops the benefits of investing in mobile homes as the benefit is the large monthly rent and the money you can make flipping the homes. If you are constantly making a payment on a large note then you might as well invest in a single family home where you will get equity. Stay away from doublewides in mobile home parks; they are not good investments and do not produce enough cash to invest in them.

9. Can I buy mobile homes, no money down?

Absolutely. Here’s the neat thing about mobile home investing is that there are people out there that are having really big problems and very motivated to sell. Maybe they have to move out of state, maybe they have got behind on their payments, maybe they have to sell it immediately and they have to move someplace else. Whatever reason they have, they are now motivated sellers. Now, even with a percentage of our population living in mobile homes and being motivated to sell you still do not see realtors fighting over mobile home listings. Most of the time the motivated seller’s only choice is to go to the dealer and see if the dealer will take it back and do you think they are? No. No of course they are not, so here’s what happens, it either sits there and it gets taken back by the bank or they try to rent it out to a family member who will end up shagging the place out or you know just a number of negative things that will happen there. So really the only help that they have is you and I. We are the only ones that will cater to this population. We are the only ones that will help them. So you can make a lot of money just solving someone’s problems by buying mobile homes, no money down.

10. How old should the mobile homes be?

Well, I spoke earlier that we don’t want this huge bill looming over our heads because the longer it takes us to pay off the mobile home the longer it’s going to take for us to actually get any money off the deal. Generally, you want a home that’s really close to being paid off or is already paid off so that you can start reaping cash flow off the property immediately. So what you’re looking for is probably 15,20 year old mobile homes but of course we said no doublewides so keep it to singlewides and that is your honey hole properties.

by Robert Woodruff

Pending Home Sales Unexpectedly Dive In November

The Pending Home Sales Index declined 2.5% in November.

Economists, who are generally surprised by everything, were caught off guard once again.

Despite the fact that mortgage rates have been climbing for months, the economists’ consensus expectation was for pending home sales to rise 0.5%. Not a single economist predicted a decline this month. The range of estimates was 0.3% to 2.0%.

Dispirited Buyers

Mortgage News Daily reports Pending Home Sales Reflect “Dispirited” Buyers.

Pending sales, which were widely expected to make a good showing in November, pulled back sharply instead. The National Association of Realtors® (NAR) said its Pending Home Sales Index (PHSI), a forward-looking indicator based on contracts for existing home purchases, declined 2.5 percent to 107.3 in November from 110.0 in October. NAR said “the brisk upswing in mortgage rates and not enough inventory dispirited some would-be buyers.” The decrease brought the PHSI to its lowest level since January of this year and it is now 0.4 percent below the index last November which stood at 107.7.

Analysts polled by Econoday had been upbeat about the November outlook. The consensus was for an increase of 0.5 percent with some analysts predicting as much as a 2.0 percent gain.

Lawrence Yun, NAR chief economist said, “The budget of many prospective buyers last month was dealt an abrupt hit by the quick ascension of rates immediately after the election. Already faced with climbing home prices and minimal listings in the affordable price range, fewer home shoppers in most of the country were successfully able to sign a contract.”

Only one of the four regions displayed any strength in November. Pending sales in the Northeast were up 0.6 percent to 97.5 and are 5.7 percent higher than in November 2015.

The Midwest saw contract signings decline 2.5 percent to 103.5, falling behind the previous November by 2.4 percent. Sales in the South were down 1.2 percent to an index of 118.7, this is 1.3 percent behind the level a year earlier. The West posted the largest loss, 6.7 percent, and a year-over-year drop of 1.0 percent.

Yun says higher borrowing costs somewhat cloud the outlook for the housing market in 2017. NAR’s most recent HOME survey, found that renters have less confidence about the present being a good time to buy than they had at the beginning of the year. On the other hand, Yun says that the impact of higher rates will be partly neutralized by stronger wage growth because of the 2 million net new job additions expected next year.

The Pending Home Sales Index is based on a large national sample, typically representing about 20 percent of transactions for existing-home sales. An index of 100 is equal to the average level of contract activity during 2001, which was the first year to be examined. By coincidence, the volume of existing-home sales in 2001 fell within the range of 5.0 to 5.5 million, which is considered normal for the current U.S. population. Pending sales are generally expected to close within two months of contract signing.

The notion that strong wage growth and jobs will partially neutralize rising interest rates is silly. But Yun has a mission: Always be as positive as possible about housing.

Economists had a second reason to expect sales would decline: On December 16, I reported Housing Starts Dive 18.7 Percent: Mortgage Rates Soar.

by Mike “Mish” Shedlock

Good as it Gets? Peaking Lodging Sector Facing Mixed Outlook from Rising Supply, Growing Influence of Airbnb

https://s14-eu5.ixquick.com/cgi-bin/serveimage?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.besthotelsaroundtheworld.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2011%2F03%2Fblanket-bay-2.jpg&sp=1503b8756737f1c05395d78d2adb9f98

In its latest outlook for the U.S. lodging sector, CBRE Hotels’ Americas Research noted that the sector will continue to accrue benefits from achieving the industry’s all-time record occupancy record in 2016 of 65.4%.

However, a range of expected factors, from new hotel supply entering the market to the growing influence of Airbrb, is expected to impact hotel returns in 2017. CBRE forecasts the average daily rate (ADR) will increase 3.3% next year, a strong positive indicator but a lower ADR growth rate than in 2016, and a continuation of a trend since 2014.

According to CBRE, ADR movement will vary by location and chain-scale, with Northern California markets such as Sacramento and Oakland, along with Washington, D.C. and Tampa projected to lead the nation, with ADR gains of more than 6% during 2017.

“Conventional wisdom says that at such high occupancy levels, hoteliers should have the leverage to implement strong price increases,” notes R. Mark Woodworth, senior managing director of CBRE Hotels’ Americas Research. “However, like for much of 2016, you need to throw conventional wisdom out the window.”

In fact, CBRE sees slight declines in occupancy combined with minimal real gains in ADR as the pattern through 2020.

“Lodging is a cyclical business and we continue to see U.S. hotels sit on top of the peak of the cycle after recovering from the Great Recession,” Woodworth said, adding that the positive outlook for lodging demand and resulting high levels of occupancy will continue to keep the sector on a steady but level path.

“While flat performance sounds disappointing, the strong underpinnings supporting continued growth in travel will prevent an outright fall from the peak,” Woodworth added.

For lodging REITs, the current cycle appears to be similar to the 1990s, during which a prolonged economic expansion sustained growth in revenue per available room (RevPAR) or nearly a decade, said Brian H. Dobson, REIT analyst for Nomura.

While lodging is entering the latter stages of its life cycle when RevPAR growth usually plateaus, supply headwinds in urban markets is expected to reduce RevPAR growth by an additional 100 basis points, resulting in 2% growth through 2018, Dobson said.

Chiming in with its hotel outlook, PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) said the lodging cycle is expected to moderate after seven years of growth. PwC analysts predicted supply growth will increase at the long-term historical average of 1.9%, but they forecast a decline in demand growth will lead to the first occupancy decline that the U.S. lodging industry has seen in eight years.

“Uncertainty, combined with plateauing growth in corporate profits, is expected to continue to weigh on corporate transient demand,” PwC said in its assessment.

“Additional demand-side concerns, including the strong U.S. dollar, Brexit, and economic weakness in the Eurozone, Zika, and depressed energy sector activity, are all expected to contribute to the continued weakness in lodging sector demand growth.”

By Randyl Drimmer | CoStar News

Housing Starts Dive 18.7 Percent: Mortgage Rates Soar

The often volatile housing starts numbers took another dive this report, down 18.7% in November according to the Census Bureau New Residential Construction report for November 2016.

Housing starts 1959-Present

https://mishgea.files.wordpress.com/2016/12/housing-starts-2016-11a.png

Year-Over-Year Detail Since 1994

https://mishgea.files.wordpress.com/2016/12/housing-starts-2016-11c.png

New Residential Construction Details

  • Permits down 4.7% from October
  • Permits down 6.6% from year ago
  • Starts down 18.7% from October
  • Starts down 6.9% from year ago
  • Completions up 15.4% in October
  • Completions up 25% from year ago

Mortgage Rates Soar

https://mishgea.files.wordpress.com/2016/12/mortgage-rates-2016-12-16a.png

Mortgage rates have risen 104 basis points (1.04 percentage points) since July 8.

As I have pointed out, this is bound to affect the housing market sooner or later. Sooner means now.

Each quarter-point hike will affect mortgage rates correspondingly until the long end of the curve refuses to rise further. At that point, we will be in recession.

Still think three hikes are coming in 2017?

By Mike “Mish” Shedlock

Fed Raised Rates Once During Obama Years, Yet Promises Constant Rate Hikes During Trump Era?

https://i0.wp.com/theeconomiccollapseblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Janet-Yellen-Public-Domain.jpg

Now that Donald Trump has won the election, the Federal Reserve has decided now would be a great time to start raising interest rates and slowing down the economy.  Over the past several decades, the U.S. economy has always slowed down whenever interest rates have been raised significantly, and on Wednesday the Federal Open Market Committee unanimously voted to raise rates by a quarter point.  Stocks immediately started falling, and by the end of the session it was their worst day since October 11th.

The funny thing is that the Federal Reserve could have been raising rates all throughout 2016, but they held off because they didn’t want to hurt Hillary Clinton’s chances of winning the election.

And during Barack Obama’s eight years, there has only been one rate increase the entire time up until this point.

But now that Donald Trump is headed for the White House, the Federal Reserve has decided that now would be a wonderful time to raise interest rates.  In addition to the rate hike on Wednesday, the Fed also announced that it is anticipating that rates will be raised three more times each year through the end of 2019

Fed policymakers are also forecasting three rate increases in 2017, up from two in September, and maintained their projection of three hikes each in 2018 and 2019, according to median estimates. They predict the fed funds rate will be 1.4% at the end of 2017, 2.1% at the end of 2018 and 2.9% at the end of 2019, up from forecasts of 1.1%, Federa1.9% and 2.6%, respectively, in September. Its long-run rate is expected to be 3%, up slightly from 2.9% previously. The Fed reiterated rate increases will be “gradual.”

So Barack Obama got to enjoy the benefit of having interest rates slammed to the floor throughout his presidency, and now Donald Trump is going to have to fight against the economic drag that constant interest rate hikes will cause.

How is that fair?

As rates rise, ordinary Americans are going to find that mortgage payments are going to go up, car payments are going to go up and credit card bills are going to become much more painful.  The following comes from CNN

Higher interest rates affect millions of Americans, especially if you have a credit card or savings account, or want to buy a home or a car. American savers have earned next to nothing at the bank for years. Now they could be a step closer to earning a little more interest on savings account deposits, even though one rate hike won’t change things overnight.

Rates on car loans and mortgages are also likely to be affected. Those are much more closely tied to the interest on a 10-year U.S. Treasury bond, which has risen rapidly since the election. With a Fed hike coming at a time when interest on the 10-year note is also rising, that won’t help borrowers.

The higher interest rates go, the more painful it will be for the economy.

If you recall, rising rates helped precipitate the financial crisis of 2008.  When interest rates rose it slammed people with adjustable rate mortgages, and suddenly Americans could not afford to buy homes at the same pace they were before.  We have already been watching the early stages of another housing crash start to erupt all over the nation, and rising rates will certainly not help matters.

https://s17-us2.ixquick.com/cgi-bin/serveimage?url=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FAkc7u.jpg&sp=eb95abd9301bb4c4d88dfdda92ec9f36

But why does the Federal Reserve set our interest rates anyway?

We are supposed to be a free market capitalist economy.  So why not let the free market set interest rates?

Many Americans are expecting an economic miracle out of Trump, but the truth is that the Federal Reserve has far more power over the economy than anyone else does.  Trump can try to reduce taxes and tinker with regulations, but the Fed could end up destroying his entire economic program by constantly raising interest rates.

Of course we don’t actually need economic central planners.  The greatest era for economic growth in all of U.S. history came when there was no central bank, and in my article entitled “Why Donald Trump Must Shut Down The Federal Reserve And Start Issuing Debt-Free Money” I explained that Donald Trump must completely overhaul how our system works if he wants any chance of making the U.S. economy great again.

One way that Trump can start exerting influence over the Fed is by nominating the right people to the Federal Open Market Committee.  According to CNN, it looks like Trump will have the opportunity to appoint four people to that committee within his first 18 months…

Two spots on the Fed’s committee are currently open for Trump to nominate. Looking ahead, Fed Chair Janet Yellen’s term ends in January 2018, while Vice Chair Stanley Fischer is up for re-nomination in June 2018.

Within the first 18 months of his presidency, Trump could reappoint four of the 12 people on the Fed’s powerful committee — an unusual amount of influence for any president.

By endlessly manipulating the economy, the Fed has played a major role in creating economic booms and busts.  Since the Fed was created in 1913, there have been 18 distinct recessions or depressions, and now the Fed is setting the stage for another one.

And anyone that tries to claim that the Fed is not political is only fooling themselves.  Everyone knew that they were not going to raise rates during the months leading up to the election, and it was quite clear that this was going to benefit Hillary Clinton.

But now that Donald Trump has won the election, the Fed all of a sudden has decided that the time is perfect to begin a program of consistently raising rates.

If I was Donald Trump, I would be looking to shut down the Federal Reserve as quickly as I could.  The essential functions that the Fed performs could be performed by the Treasury Department, and we would be much better off if the free market determined interest rates instead of some bureaucrats.

Unfortunately, most Americans have come to accept that it is “normal” to have a bunch of unelected, unaccountable central planners running our economic system, and so it is unlikely that we will see any major changes before our economy plunges into yet another Fed-created crisis.

By Michael Snyder | The Economic Collapse

Anecdotal Path To Lower Rates

https://martinhladyniuk.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/ericpeters.jpg?w=938

With the Dow Jones just a handful of gamma imbalance rips away from 20,000, the CIO of One River Asset Management, Eric Peters, shares some critical perspective on the market’s recent euphoric surge, going so far as to brand what is going on as America’s “Massive Policy Error”, the biggest in the past 50 years. 

His thoughts are presented below, framed in his typical “anecdotal” way.

Anecdote:

“America’s Massive Policy Error,” said the CIO. “That’s the title of the book someone will write in ten years about what’s happening today.” Never in economic history has a government implemented a fiscal stimulus of this size at full employment.

“The Trump team and economic elites believe that anemic corporate capital expenditure is the root cause of today’s lackluster growth.” It’s not that simple.

If credit to first-time homebuyers hadn’t been cut off post-2008, and state and local governments had spent as generously as they had after every other crisis, this recovery would have been like all others.

“People think that if only we cut taxes, kill Obamacare, and build some bridges, then American CEOs will start spending. That’s nonsense.” Ageing demographics, slowing population growth, and massive economy-wide debts have left CEOs unenthusiastic about expanding productive capacity.

“You make the most money in macro investing when there are policy errors and this will be the biggest one in 50yrs. These guys are going to crash the economy.” But not yet. First the anticipation of higher borrowing and rising growth expectations will widen interest rate differentials. Which will lift the dollar. But unlike recent episodes of dollar strength, this one will be accompanied by higher equities as investors ignore tightening financial conditions because they expect offsetting tax cuts and infrastructure spending.

Emboldened by higher equity prices, bond bears will push yields higher, lifting the dollar further, validating people’s belief in a strong economy in the kind of reflexive loop that Soros described in The Alchemy of Finance – the kind that drives extreme macro trends.

This will be like the 1985 dollar super-spike. And the Fed will eventually be forced to follow the steepening yield curve, hiking rates aggressively, tightening the debt noose, killing the economy. Then rates will collapse, crushing the dollar.”

Source: Centinel 2012

The Dramatic Impact Of Surging Rates On Housing In One Chart

https://martinhladyniuk.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/5273f-murrietatemeculabankruptcyattorneydavidnelsonpitfalls.jpgTo visualize the impact the recent spike in mortgage rates will have on the US housing market in general, and home refinancing activity in particular, look no further than this chart from the October Mortgage Monitor slidepack by Black Knight

The chart profiles the sudden collapse of the refi market using October and November rates. As Black Knight writes, it looks at the – quite dramatic – effect the mortgage rate rise has had on the population of borrowers who could both likely qualify for and have interest rate incentive to refinance. It finds it was cut in half in just one month.

Some more details from the source:

  • The results of the U.S. presidential election triggered a treasury bond selloff, resulting in a corresponding rise in both 10-year treasury and 30-year mortgage interest rates
  • Mortgage rates have jumped 49 BPS in the 3 weeks following the election, cutting the population of refinanceable borrowers from 8.3 million immediately prior to the election to a total of just 4 million, matching a 24-month low set back in July 2015
  • Though there are still 2M borrowers who could save $200+/month by refinancing and a cumulative $1B/month in potential savings, this is less than half of the $2.1B/ month available just four weeks ago
  • The last time the refinanceable population was this small, refi volumes were 37 percent below Q3 2016 levels

https://i0.wp.com/www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/images/user5/imageroot/2016/11/29/black%20knight%202_0.jpg

Which is bad news not only for homeowners, but also for the banks, whose refi pipeline – a steady source of income and easy profit – is about to vaporize.

It’s not just refinancings, however, According to the report, as housing expert Mark Hanson notes, here is a summary of the adverse impact the spike in yields will also have on home purchases:

  • Overall purchase origination growth is slowing, from 23% in Q3’15 to 7% in Q3’16.
  • The highest degree of slowing – and currently the slowest growing segment of the market – is among high credit borrowers (740+ credit scores).
  • The 740+ segment has been mainly responsible for the overall recovery in purchase volumes and in fact, currently accounts for 2/3 of all purchase lending in the market today.
  • Since Q3’15 the growth rate in this segment has dropped from 27% annually to 5% in Q3’16. (NOTE, Q3/Q4’15 included TRID & interest rate volatility making it an easy comp).
  • This naturally raises the question of whether we are nearing full saturation of this market segment.
  • Low credit score growth is still relatively slow, and only accounts of 15% of all lending (as compared to 40% from 2000-2006), the lowest share of purchase originations for this group on record.
    ITEM 2) The “Refi Capital Conveyor Belt” has ground to a halt, which will be felt across consumer spend. AND Rates are much higher now than in October when this sampling was done.

Source: ZeroHedge | Data Source